The
family, unlike others, and myself do not want to sue the church; everyone
suffers in that scenario except those who told the parents to do this
work. It is not fair to the congregation
to suffer for the actions of their leaders; the members of the congregation may
or may not have been aware of what was happening. I met the son and wife as they were
attempting to shame the Church of God into repaying the money this man fleeced
from the parents, and the only progress they have made is as follows:
1. The Church of God International agrees the
money is owed, but states it is a local issue, and refuses to step in.
2. Other
Churches of God in the area do not condemn or condone the actions of the
Pineville Church of God.
3. The
Reverend admits the work was performed, but now states it was
unapproved/unauthorized work.
This family has
weathered the July 4 storm, the Franken-storm, and now a winter in a 14x16
tent. This group fleeces those who are
elderly, and have enough in retirement pay that they do not qualify for
aid. The son lost his job because of the
actions of this group, making threats against the families of his co-workers,
and causing problems with his employer.
This brings me to
another point of action this organization partakes. Some members of this group have been
convicted of being child molesters, and some would say Jesus forgives. However, some of these members are placed in
positions of authority, coaching church teams in youth leagues, becoming youth
ministers, and in some cases shepherding our children on church outings (such
as youth camping trips). The local media
and law enforcement agencies are afraid of this group; they say it is political
suicide (or outright suicide). The
Attorney General’s brother is a member of this group; he was the judge in the
family’s eviction hearing.
This group claims that
they do charity work in other countries, but when asked the only agreement I
have found is that they do charity work overseas. One said they thought that some money went to
South Africa. Another thought they were helping Haiti, and one claimed that the
money was going to Muslim nations to help promote democracy.
I recall that one judge
did decide to stand against this group, and their actions, and he paid a steep
price for his actions. His home address
was posted online, along with a picture of his home, allowing a member of this
group to find his home, and threaten his terminally ill wife, along with his
children. Nothing was done to this
preacher, and this judge faced possible disbarment, because of his outburst in
court after he learned what had happened.
The attorney general and Supreme Court sided with the group, but in the end,
the Supreme Court found in his favor. This
is why the local media is so afraid of this group, outside of threats against
the reporters, and editors.
No comments:
Post a Comment