Alright, so finally after a while, my
reserved copy of Hillary Clinton's book came in, and I started
reading it. This doesn't happen often, and might be a result of
blood pressure medication, but I am trying to sort out my thoughts
about what I have read thus far, and I am not having much luck with
it. Maybe the outrage about every little thing that happened in the
primaries is too fresh, maybe the anxiety of how big of a mess we are
actually in is clouding how I feel. Maybe its just that I can't get
over the commentary of the Clinton supports, that continues to this
very day, hasn't come to a head, and its not truly ready to be
excised from my mind. One thing I know for certain, the wounds that
were inflicted in the primaries, and the aftermath of this freak show
aren't healing, and that will take time. Time we simply do not have.
Where do I begin? First, I am down on
Clinton, I don't like her policies, I don't like her hawkishness, I
don't like her ties to things I feel are wrong with our country. I'm
just a simple guy at heart, I want a nice ride, a nice home, to eat
out without fear of breaking my bank account. I don't want a job, I
want a career, someplace I can hang my hat for twenty or thirty
years, walk out on my own terms, to live comfortably with a wife and
kids. And at the heart of my disdain for Secretary Clinton is the
notion that I wouldn't have any of those things. Its the same reason
I hold disdain for President Trump. Nothing changes for the better,
everything just continues its slow decent until it doesn't, it just
falls off the cliff into an abyss of misery and suffering that most
people in the United States simply cannot understand.
A quick rehash before I start, because
this needs to have a some levity to it. In the last decade, I have
watched my family business fail. I have been homeless. I watched my
father die after being assaulted in a hospital. I have faced racism.
I have faced classism. I have faced poverty. Long term
unemployment. Heath crises. I have stood against political
corruption for almost two decades, I have gone to places in the US
that most wouldn't believe existed. Not just me, my entire family,
and countless other families. I should probably say we, but I use I,
because I am writing out of personal experiences, family lore, and
what I have personally seen others encounter and face. It is true, a
Liberal sees things and says this should never happen to anyone. For
me, it is a case of nobody should be forced, or have to walk down the
same path I do. For it is dark and lonely and cold, and every step
you take, you loose something else of yourself, and should you
finally emerge from the cold and lonely darkness, you are never
really the same.
So, where to begin here? Well, when I
first picked up the book, I noticed that the story is her story, and
that is perfectly fine. I've nothing against writing from
perspective, I do it all the time. We all do, and I know some people
will see this as more of the “It's all about me!” deal that
Clinton is notorious for, its an acceptable thing. She is after all
writing her thoughts and views. The book is short, around 470 pages
not including the authors note and index. Yeah, this book comes with
an index so you can read her views on specific things, like you have
in a school book. The picture on the inside cover is her accepting
the nomination, and guess what, the protesters are shown sitting in
darkness. She explains the purpose of the book quickly, and without
fanfare. But quoting the movie A League of Their Own, and Nietzsche,
when Jerry McGuire (“Show me the Money!”) would likely be more
fitting for the Democratic Party today. Nietzsche, a nihilist, was
interesting to quote, even if it is one of his most famous quotes.
At this point, I need to say that it is not true, “What does not
kill us, makes us stronger.” is patently false. What does not kill
us, takes years off of our lives, and incurs massive medical bills,
which creates stress, and will ultimately lead to coronary failure or
stroke.
I should mention that this review is
going to be slightly disjointed, as things tend to pop into my mind
randomly. So, I might have read something earlier in the book, and
yeah, I just thought it was relevant. Anyway, she spends most of the
first chapter, if you can call this a chapter in a traditional sense,
talking about persevering in the face of adversity. Hey, that is
legitimately heart warming, we come into this world kicking and
screaming, we go through life settling, and at the end we mostly
peaceably leave this life. Me, I came in kicking and screaming, I'm
still kicking and screaming, and when I die, I'll be kicking and
screaming. Okay so what was this first chapter discussing, the loss.
How she felt in the immediate aftermath of loosing to Trump. She
grieved over loosing, took it hard, decided that it was best after a
contentious election to stay away from the protests that happened
afterwards. She spoke of going to Trump's wedding, even though they
weren't friends, and I'm sorry, but even if asked, I don't go to
weddings of people who are passing acquaintances. Yeah, I am not
famous, but thats just weird, even if it was just for “star power.”
We move onto the Inauguration, in which Clinton says that “Dubya”
Bush said that Trumps Inaugural speech was “That was some weird
s—t.” We move onto gratitude for the loss, and really jump in
both feet.
So we next return to the fall of 2014,
when Clinton first started kicking around a run for President.
Obama, according to her, persuaded her to run, to continue his
legacy. She wasn't reluctant to run, by no means, she was motivated
by helping. But she also says that in retrospect, her speeches to
Wall Street, while perfectly normal and acceptable (which they are),
were not the best choice given the economic blowup of 2008-2009.
Yeah, let us forget that Clinton, Bill for that matter, made no
effort to fight deregulation that helped the 2008 Economic blowup,
and that Hillary deferred to Schumer, a neutral person. Let us also
acknowledge the fact that this happened on the GOP's watch, while she
held a seat in the Senate, and was hands off on Wall Street
regulation. In her mind, because she took a hands off approach she
is clear of any blow back from the 2008 issues. Furthering this, she
had no problem giving private speeches to the very entities who
practically destroyed our economy. She recounts telling the story of
Bin Laden being killed multiple times, and while its great fodder, I
have a feeling that there was always more to these speeches. It is
her contention that she should have realized that giving those
speeches could potentially be problematic in the future, given the
resentment against Wall Street. You think? They nearly destroyed
the economy, people lost everything they owned, they lost their
savings, their retirements, and all I got was a $200 check, that I
had to pay taxes on the following year. Hey, I admit it, I'm still
bitter about that whole f—k up. Hey, things were looking bad on
the farm in the lead up to the collapse, but we had survived worse
than a market downturn. What we couldn't survive, was a market
downturn and a full down economic collapse in which loans evaporated.
So, yeah, I think the agitation about Wall Street is well founded,
given how much people lost, how much Wall Street got in bailouts, and
we the people got a few dollars.
All right, all right, I am still touchy
about that, and I do believe that had our Senators and Congress
people had actually been, I don't know, doing their job, half of that
nonsense wouldn't have happened. In my mind it was the greatest
single theft in the history of the world. And here she is saying,
“Yeah, giving speeches to the very people who nearly destroyed
everything was likely a bad idea.” No shyte. Well at least she
says she told them to “cut it out.” before they tanked the
economy ruining countless numbers of people. According to one
executive, “She wasn't engaging on those issues. She just didn't
have a lot of interest.” ~sighs~
So she claims that she ran for
president to help people, because as a Senator, a Representative, or
Secretary of State you can't help all that many people, but as
president you can save the world. Well, at least the world that
matters, Americans, while we continuing to carpet bomb the crap out
of everything else. I'm sorry, but as a Senator or a member of the
House of Representatives, you have more power than the President.
Hey, I've got a new drinking game all planned out. While reading
this book about life, the universe and how Hillary Clinton couldn't
beat the single worst presidential candidate in my recollection of
human history, every time she brings up the Clinton Foundation you
take a shot of liquor. Every time she talks about all the good it
has done, drink a few more shots. If she talks about daughters life
experiences drink several more. When she talks about her
grandchildren, don't drink, do it for the kids. Thus far, almost a
quarter of this book is about her foundation, and her plans, but she
doesn't flesh out her plans, just that she had them.
So at this point, we are on the Kessel
Run... I mean on a secret trip to Iowa, and she isn't even committed
to running for president in 2016. They've loaded up Scoobie (a black
van) and have set off on a secret trip, only to be foiled by
Chipolte, and grainy security camera footage. As we move along we
get into the Primary and Caucus seasons, and irony of irony, she
talks about how Sanders got more delegates because he won a caucus in
Washington State. I seem to recall that even when they were close to
tie, the media (which she said was on a witch hunt), she would have
several more delegates than Sanders. That whole, Super Delegates
being tallied along with regular delegates. She now she is hitting
the revisionist button. She did have a large lead in the delegate
count, when you take into account the Super Delegates. Really? Tim
Kaine her VP pick was a Super Delegate, and if you say that you or he
could be impartial about a vote, considering you are voting
for/against the person offering you a job... I'll call you a liar,
each and every time. You are going to vote for the person offering
the job. She rejects the notion that her campaign was flawed,
considering all the events that happened during the cycle. But the
truth is, even should she wish to ignore it, this was an
anti-establishment cycle, people who were seen as insiders were
viewed with cynicism, and she was the inside candidate. Certainly
the FBI letter didn't help her cause, but being honest, she messed
up.
I don't think I have been very fair
here. I came in really not liking Secretary Clinton, and while I
have been decent, I haven't been overly nice. I am trying to stay
neutral, hard as it can be. But she is right about something here,
Democrats need better data, and they need to adapt better than they
have in the past. The problem is, even my own representatives, they
tend to live in a bubble. Listening isn't a strong point, of anyone
in office these days, they listen to money. Follow the money, and
you'll find the voice on the other end of the tin can.
Okay, so, I have to say something,
because honestly I am offended here. Yeah I know, its easy to offend
me at times, it is just a matter of the subject. If you tell your
daughter that she could become the President of the United States,
great. Honestly, I believe that there is a young woman somewhere in
this land that has that dream, and rightfully so. We do not need
anyone to say they are going to be the first to confirm that dream.
That dream is valid all on its own, as is the dream of some youth who
believes he has the skills required to play professional ball, or to
be the CEO of a major corporation. All we need do is plant the seeds
in our daughters, and to instill that the will to achieve must be
strong as steel, but flexible as a twig in the wind. We must teach
out daughters to be strong and resilient, to deal with the stupidity
of others, while being confident in their ideology and themselves.
You know, I thought this might be a
little fun, I figured I could read her book, and get to see things
from her point of view. But the thing is, this book, all four
hundred some odd pages are really just a rehash of the election.
Yeah, Trump went to the low hanging hate fruit. But thats been their
thing since 2001. Hatred of Muslims, fear of terrorist attacks, fear
of gun grabbing, hatred for the poor, etc... Hate and fear are what
drives the GOP, and I don't need to hear it from Clinton, I see
enough of its poison on a daily basis. And yeah, she talked a big
game about unity, while her online surrogates played the same game
the GOP does, and they know the game, so they won it. To some
extent, now they are playing the “I told you so.” card, and yeah,
thats going to work out really well here. The fact of it is, for all
the good she says she wanted to do, it doesn't matter now. Stronger
Together, Love Trumps Hate, or whatever catchy slogan you want to
pontify, or if you insist on asking all those who voted for neither
Trump or Clinton and Trump's supporters “If they are happy now?”
I can tell you, they weren't happy at the start of the election cycle
of 2016, they are equally as unhappy today. To me, all this book is,
is just a means of keeping the hornets wet and angry. I wish I could
say this book was insightful, well the half I read of it, but its
just rehashing the same tired song and dance, red meat for her base
who feels screwed, cringe worthy for those who aren't her base. I
don't know, maybe you'll take something else away from it. I won't
tell anyone to buy it, just go check it out at the library, or wait a
while, I'm sure it'll find its way to the bargain bin shortly.
Basically the first half of the book is mostly about her foundation,
the next portion talks about her policy ideas, without even
discussing them, just I had ideas. Followed by Sanders hanging
around too long, and GOP fear and hate. Honestly, I doubt anything
will be gleaned from finishing this book. Now, if you will excuse
me, I need to come up with some money so I can cover yet another set
of unexpected bills that I acquired for myself. I would say thank
Obama, or Thank Trump, but at this point, I am going to thank my
crappy genetics and a hard life made so much better by Trickle Down
Economics, something Democrats and Republicans agree with.
No comments:
Post a Comment